Email Us

Two customer evaluations across organoid and cell-banking workflows demonstrate that Revella Cell Thawing System delivers nearly identical cell growth performance to conventional water baths — with less contamination risk and full traceability.


For decades, the water bath has been the standard tool for thawing cryopreserved cells. It is familiar, accessible, and inexpensive.


But it is also open, unstandardized, and increasingly unsuitable for GMP-grade cell therapy workflows. Operator-dependent technique, lack of traceability, and contamination risk have pushed many labs to ask:


Can a water-free thawing system deliver the same cell performance — with better process control?


CellStore recently commissioned two independent customer evaluations to answer exactly this question. The results are clear: across organoid and cell-banking workflows, Revella delivered cell growth performance nearly identical to conventional water bath thawing — while offering a cleaner, more traceable, and GMP-friendly workflow.


Evaluation 1: Organoid Workflow (0.5 mL)

Parameter

Detail

Format

0.5 mL cryovials

Sample size

3 batches

Comparison

Revella vs. water bath

Time points

Day 0 (baseline) and Day 4

Assessment

Post-thaw morphology and apparent growth


revella-customer-evaluations01.jpg


Outcome: Across all three batches, Revella and water-bath samples showed visually comparable morphology and apparent growth at Day 4. The customer reported “nearly identical performance” between the two methods.


Why this matters: Organoids are three-dimensional structures that are particularly sensitive to thermal stress. The fact that Revella — a dry-heating system — produced equivalent morphological outcomes suggests that the controlled thawing environment does not compromise the structural integrity of complex biological samples.


Evaluation 2: Cell-Banking Workflow (1.0 mL & 1.5 mL)

Parameter

1.0 mL Format

1.5 mL Format

Clones evaluated

6

4

Total vials

22

16

Concentration range

0.6–2.0 × 10⁷ cells/mL

Uniform 3.0 × 10⁷ cells/mL

Passages tracked

P0–P2

P0–P2

Assessment

VCD, viability, growth profiles

VCD, viability, growth profiles


revella-customer-evaluations02.jpg


Outcome: VCD, viability, and passage-level growth profiles were closely aligned between the two thawing methods. The customer reported “nearly identical cell-growth performance” over three passages.


Why this matters: Cell banking requires reproducible recovery across multiple clones, vials, and passages. The close alignment between Revella and water-bath thawing across 10 clones and 38 vials demonstrates that Revella can support consistent, scalable cell-banking workflows without compromising cell quality.


Combined Validation Summary

Metric

Result

Total vials tested

38

Total clones evaluated

10

Passages tracked

P0–P2

Workflows covered

Organoid + Cell banking

Conclusions

“Nearly identical” in both cases


Why Revella Performs

The customer evaluations confirm that Revella’s thawing mechanism delivers cell performance equivalent to water baths. This is enabled by:

  • Direct-contact dry heating — eliminates open-water exposure and contamination risk

  • Real-time infrared monitoring — ±0.1°C temperature accuracy during thawing

  • Automatic endpoint control — reduces operator-dependent variability

  • 2 mL & 5 mL cryovial compatibility — flexible for different formats


The result: Consistent, reproducible thawing with full traceability — without the contamination risk and process variability associated with traditional water baths.


How to Qualify Revella in Your Workflow

revella-customer-evaluations03.jpg

The customer cases support evaluating Revella as a water-free alternative. CellStore recommends a four-step qualification approach:


Step 1 — Match the container
Confirm your vial format, fill volume, and adapter fit.


Step 2 — Match the thaw SOP
Define endpoint, handling window, and operator steps.


Step 3 — Confirm cell quality
Assess recovery, viability, phenotype, and function.


Step 4 — Run a side-by-side comparison
Qualify Revella against your current thawing SOP using your own cell lines and readouts.


Conclusion

The transition from water-bath thawing to a water-free system is not about replacing a familiar tool. It is about reducing contamination risk, increasing traceability, and standardizing a critical process step — without compromising cell quality.


Across organoid and cell-banking workflows, Revella has demonstrated that water-free thawing can deliver “nearly identical” performance to water baths. That is the starting point for qualification — and the foundation for a more controlled, reproducible thawing workflow.


Learn more or request a qualification plan: Contact CellStore

Related Cryopreservation Media
Quick Links
What Is Mesenchymal Cryopreservation Medium? NK Cell Culture Media Guide: Key Factors for NK Cell Expansion and Activity What Is Cryopreservation Media? Definition, Composition, and Applications Customer Case|CS-PM-D1 Enables High-Quality CBMC Cryopreservation Key Points for Evaluating Cryopreservation Effectiveness and Sample Transfer CellStore Stem Cell Cryopreservation Medium: Powering China's Stem Cell Therapy Revolution in 2025 Critical Considerations for Effective Cryopreservation of Cells and Tissues: from Experimental Design to Protocol Execution Reshaping the Microcosm of Life: Let 3D Models Say Goodbye to the "Frostbite" Era How to Freeze and Thaw Cells with Cell Freezing Medium? How to Choose the Right Tissue Culture Media? Cryopreservation Best Practices 8 Components of Tissue Culture Media Homemade freezing medium or commercial freezing medium? Simplifying PBMC Cryopreservation without Compromise — Application 1 Simplifying PBMC Cryopreservation: Direct Freezing of Whole Blood Application 2 How Does Cryopreservation Media Protect Cells During Freezing and Long-Term Storage? Cryopreservation of Embryos Advantages What Is Cryopreservation of Stem Cells and Is It Worth It? Does Cryopreservation Impact T Cell Viability and Therapeutic Efficacy? A Stable Freeze–Thaw Step Can Make All The Difference In Cd34⁺ Cell Workflows. Why Does “dead volume” Still Challenge Automated Cgt Manufacturing — And How Can We Design Around It Instead Of Fighting It? Case Sharing | Clinical Application: Performance Interpretation of CS-SC-D1 Cryopreservation Medium Technology Sharing | Rethinking CHO Cell Banking: Toxicity, Workflow Burden & Simpler Operations CS-DX-N2 Keeps >90% Of Cells Alive, With Markers Virtually Unchanged From Fresh What Happens to Cell Viability After 3–6 Months of Cryopreservation? Cryopreservation Challenges in iMSC Cell Therapy Workflows Cryopreservation for CAR-NK Cells: Functional Retention Matters Stability Under Extended 4°C Holding In Msc Manufacturing Post-Thaw Stability Under Room-Temperature Holding In Msc Manufacturing Beyond Viability: Evaluating PBMC Cryopreservation from a Post-Thaw Workflow Perspective Understanding PBMC Freezing and Culture New product launch — meet AirLite Cells need to be more than alive after thawing How to Cryopreserve Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) Methods for Preparing and Using Cell Freezing Media What Are the Different Types of Tissue Culture Medium? Isolation, Freezing, and Thawing of PBMCs CellStore Q&A Series |Why Choose Commercial Cryopreservation Media Over Homemade Formulations How to Choose Xeno-Free Media for T Cell and NK Cell Culture What Is T Cell Culture Medium and How to Choose the Right Formula? Revella Customer Evaluations: Water-Free Thawing Delivers Comparable Performance to Water Baths
Email
lumy@cellstore-global.com
Tel
010-82170580
Address
5-101, Bldg. 10, No. 6 Dongsheng Science and Technology Park North St., Haidian Dist., Beijing, China.